[00:00:00] Speaker A: This is where projects come to life. Our showrooms are designed to inspire with the latest products from top brands curated in an inviting, hands on environment and a team of industry experts to support your project. We'll be there to make sure everything goes as planned, from product selection to delivery coordination at Ferguson Bath Kitchen and Lighting gallery. Your project is our priority. Discover great brands like Samsung at your local Ferguson showroom.
Hugh Hewitt explains the real truth we're.
[00:00:32] Speaker B: Going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line.
[00:00:37] Speaker A: If I get elected now, if I.
[00:00:38] Speaker B: Don'T get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath. That's going to be the least of it. You're talking about the automobile industry, domestic manufacturing.
[00:00:45] Speaker C: It is so obvious that you have.
[00:00:47] Speaker D: To be either stupid or malign to misreport it.
[00:00:51] Speaker B: The Hugh Hewitt show weekday mornings at five on am 1280.
[00:00:57] Speaker A: The Patriot Intelligent Radio hi, this is Rhett Rasmussen of besthotgrill.com. we make the amazing Solaire infrared gas grills that are built to last and will consistently deliver better than restaurant grilled food. The solaire infrared burner heats up to 1000 degrees in just three minutes, even in the dead of winter. The high heat locks in the juices and flavor and grills food faster. Learn more about these fantastic USA made
[email protected]. dot Solaire hot fast
[email protected] dot the new two part documentary Trump's front row Joe's is the first inside look at Trump's die hard fans.
[00:01:37] Speaker B: The front row joes are incredible people.
[00:01:40] Speaker A: Camping out for days to be the front row at every Trump rally to support their hero.
[00:01:45] Speaker B: The kind of basis for all the rallies.
[00:01:47] Speaker E: There's like dead fans.
[00:01:49] Speaker A: Trump's front row joes from executive producer Sean Spicer.
[00:01:52] Speaker B: You had to love Mister Donald Trump.
[00:01:54] Speaker A: Trump's front row joes watch it now.
[00:01:56] Speaker D: Go to satellmnow.com dot the Caribbean is calling Dennis Prager here. I invite you to join me on a Bible cruise this November in the Caribbean. Imagine nine days of basking in the sun, surrounded by the stunning beauty of a tropical paradise. We'll cruise to the vibrant islands of half moon, cay, curacao, bonaire and more, while making unforgettable memories with like minded travelers. Stroll through Curacao's iconic pastel colored shops and snorkel in Bonaire's world class coral reefs. You'll enjoy some of the most delicious cuisine aboard Holland America's Rotterdam, a fantastic itself with riveting shows and spectacular views. This experience is more than a vacation. It's a chance to participate in profound discussions. The fresh insights I will share with you about the books of the Bible and current events should energize and challenge you. Mark your calendars November 29 to December 8, 2024. Learn more and secure your spot on this once in a lifetime adventure by calling 855-56-5519 or booking
[email protected]. dot this is Dennis Prager. Now you can listen to my show when it's convenient for you and without censorship from Big Tech. Become a member of the ultimate online community for all things Prager. It's Pragertopia Unlimited. Listen to the show on demand when it's easiest for you. This includes every radio show, every segment and every guest over the last ten years, and it's commercial free. You can even share your favorite segments with your friends. Plus, you'll get the same email from Alan Estrin that I receive every night about the most important, important issues to read about. Pragertopia Unlimited members can also listen to every program, lecture and course that is in the Prager store thousands of hours. You can even listen to all my Torah teachings for free. Share my passion for free speech. Join today and save 25% off the first year and get a free Pragertopia coffee mug. It's all things Prager. Pragertopia Unlimited. Go to pragertopia.com or click the
[email protected].
[00:04:00] Speaker A: Dot during the recent storms that came through our area, a lot of homes sustained damage to their roofing, siding and windows. I'm Freddie, president of wild Construction, your local exterior construction company. Our team is very experienced through the claims process. We do a free, full inspection of your home, provide you with photos, a write up and a three year hail history report of your address. To schedule an inspection, go to wildconstructionmn.com. that's wild construction mn.com dot. Wild construction makes it happen.
The following program was pre recorded and the views expressed do not necessarily represent those of this station or its management.
This is open your eyes radio with Doctor Kerry Gelb.
[00:04:41] Speaker E: Good morning. I'm Doctor Kerry Gelb, and welcome to Wellness 1280 on open your eyes radio. Please listen as I discuss the newest information in the world of health, nutrition and sports every Saturday morning 06:00 a.m. central time on AM 1280 of the Patriots. Also, please share your thoughts by emailing
[email protected] dot that's drkerrygelbmail.com and visit my new website, wellness 1280 dot where we have all guest links. Wellness 1280 info and previous shows. Wellness is taking over the Patriot Airways. For the next hour, sit back and enjoy my conversation with Doctor Steve Way. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus two it's a lot to say. SARS Cov two is the virus that causes the respiratory infection Covid-19 confusion exists to the origin of this virus that has estimated to have killed over 1 million americans. Today's guest, Doctor Stephen Kway, MD, PhD, has studied the origin of the coronavirus nature versus lab leak in his new book, the Origin of the Virus, the hidden truths behind the virus that killed millions of people. This book is a shocking account of the extreme experiments of the COVID ups and the collusions that led to the outbreak of the worst pandemic since the 1918 spanish influenza and explores why scientists were censored and blocked from proper investigation of the origin of Covid-19. Doctor Kway holds 87 US patents invented seven FDA approved US pharmaceuticals, has testified in the US Congress on the topic of the origin of the virus and the topic of the origin of Covid-19. Doctor kway, thank you for joining me today.
[00:06:37] Speaker B: It's great to be here, Kerry, and I appreciate your listeners dialing in and hopefully we can straighten out some of these confusions which are not so confusing if you just look at the facts.
[00:06:49] Speaker E: So let me ask you to start off. Where are we right now with Covid-19 how prevalent is it in the United States right now? Are people still getting it? Are people dying from it?
[00:07:00] Speaker B: Yeah. So I think the best way to say it is that as expected, I think for any new virus that enters the humans, what doesn't kill you outright makes you stronger. So, as expected, it has attenuated itself largely in the population, but it's endemic and it's going to be here carried for the rest of the rest of time. I like to tell people, you know, we are alive. The people who are alive now from western Europe have the signature of the black plague from 1536 in our immune system. And we're going to have the signature of this virus for the better or worse forever.
[00:07:36] Speaker E: Now, if you get the virus now, what is the best treatment? We've heard about ivermectin and we've heard about hydroxychloroquine. And in fact, there's some research that the government actually studied ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Chloroquine itself when Cov one first came out that that was actually one of the cures for it. And then they asked the government, I guess it was the DoD asked DARPA to investigate more and they said that ivermectin was actually a cure for Covid. So what is the best treatment if you get Covid, what should we do?
[00:08:17] Speaker B: Well, so let's. I like to start with foundations and then build up from there. So, I mean, early in the process, we saw that the virus was getting in by a common pathway into cells that SARS one did, that other viruses do by attaching to a protein called ace two. So that's its 80 20 process of getting into the cells. But the thing is diabolical. So it has a backdoor in through something called the endosomes, where it fuses somewhere else on the membrane. It makes a little circle in the cell and then it goes inside and breaks open. Well, both hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are inhibitors of endosomal uptake. So if you wanted to guess, you know, just from foundations, that something might work for that alternative pathway, which again, is. Is around 20% to 30%. But it still could be significant. You would have predicted that those two drugs would work. And in fact, in cells, in the. In the laboratory they worked, and in some of the early trials where they weren't a clinical trials, like my standards of getting a drug approved. But I felt there was a pretty strong evidence for what I would call the right try.
I'm pretty old school. I think that if you have a good doctor and a patient, they should sit together quietly in a room by themselves with no interference, and decide what's the best pathway. Because medicine is very personalized. It is a part science, but it's a lot of art, the concept that a bureaucrat somewhere two or 3000 miles away could tell me how to practice medicine. It makes the hair in my arms stand up.
[00:09:49] Speaker E: Now, the ace two receptor is very important to get the virus in. Now there's something with like Advil type medications that actually increase ace two receptors. And it would be bad if you actually get Covid, is that correct? And if you could explain it a little bit better than me.
[00:10:08] Speaker B: Yeah. So we don't have ace two on our cells because we want to collect coronaviruses. This is a foundation for what's called the renin angiotensin system, which is a really cool mechanism between the heart and the kidneys and the blood vessels and the lungs to manage high blood pressure, to manage the fluid flow there are drugs that will, for example, lower your blood pressure, and they can change the ace two receptors on your cells. Nicotine can reduce them in February of 2020. Imagine how far back we are. There were studies that showed that smokers in China had either milder cases or less severe cases or lower deaths, which is a little counterintuitive unless you realize that nicotine can actually down regulate ace two, so they had fewer receptors to get into a cell.
It's all kind of explainable if you get down into the processes.
[00:11:08] Speaker E: Let me make sure I understood you would agree that we want to stay away from Advil type medications if you get Covid, but would Tylenol be okay?
[00:11:17] Speaker B: Yes, Tylenol will be okay.
If you're not bothered by the stomach effects of aspirin, it has a little additional abilities that the Tylenol drugs don't.
Yes, you want to control the symptoms. You want to get a lot of fluid, you want to maybe stay in your bedroom so you don't give it to the rest of the people in your house. But at this point in time, unless you have a lot of comorbidities. And the simple way I define a comorbidity is, are you going to a specialist doctor once a month? Because if you're doing that, you probably have a condition that qualifies you as being at a little higher risk.
You're probably not going to have any problems with the sars that is currently circulating.
[00:11:58] Speaker E: And they recommend nasal flushes, steam peroxide gargling. Peroxide gargling with listerine. What do you think about that? How about natural things like curcitin and the vitamin d, n, acetyl, cysteine, zinc. How do you feel about that?
[00:12:18] Speaker B: Sure. So the way the virus works is it spends about day and a half, two days either in the nose, in the back of your nose, or the back of your throat. And if you can catch it there, if you can kill it there, prevent it going to your lungs, you're done with it. So, in fact, at the height of it, when I was actually recommending you come home, you just gargle with salt water. I didn't do the nasal cleansing or that sort of thing, but those kinds of things can be very effective early on. The problem is you're not going to likely have symptoms. So unless you're going to do that every time you come home from outside, you may not catch it in that stage. But we do know lots of other things will help the immune system, will boost the immune system. Vitamin D, we always think of as a bone hormone. But if you really look at what it does in the body physiologically, it's almost an immune module more than its effects in the bone. So many of these natural products.
Now, nasyl cysteine is very interesting. Remember that it's called the corona, which stands for crown in Latin.
Under the microscope, it's got this ball, a spike protein on top of a stem. The stem on the surface is attached to sideways with bonds that are broken by n acyl cysteine. So it's like the high tension, you know, it's like the high power towers, you know, which have the lateral wires. You cut the lateral wires and it may not fall down, but the first little bit of wind causes it to fall down. So I think anti soliciting is absolutely important, you know, for blocking it.
[00:13:59] Speaker E: You know, I thought it was interesting that pepcid, people that have heartburn, that pepcid actually could be effective in helping against the virus.
[00:14:07] Speaker B: All of those in the laboratory, it's pretty amazing. It's a really tight race between it growing enough to hurt you and your immune system catching it.
[00:14:16] Speaker E: I'm just going to cut you off for a second. I'm speaking to doctor Steven Kway. This is Doctor Kerry go for open your eyes radio. We'll be right back.
[00:14:31] Speaker C: I went to the eye doctor the other day with my daughter Maggie. I was shocked when the doctor told me that my daughter was already becoming nearsighted. It turns out that this problem affects more than 40% of Americans. My eye doctor thinks this disease is getting worse. Perhaps it's getting worse because of kids prolonged time spent playing with smartphones. Or maybe because kids now spend less time outside. My genetics probably aren't helping her a whole lot, being nearsighted myself. But the good news is that the doctor told me about a new FDA approved product called mysight. This specific one day contact lens is already worn by thousands of children in the US. It is proven to slow down the progression of nearsightedness. And best of all, Maggie loves these contact lenses. The doctor taught her how to use them. Now it is so exciting to see her have even more success in the classroom and when she plays sports. I recommend you visit openyoureyesradio.com to find an eye doctor that specializes in this treatment program. Learn
[email protected] dot join Gene Sullivan each.
[00:15:33] Speaker A: Week on where you live, where he takes on, uh, Gene, who do you take on anyway? Maniacal landlords, slippery renters, overbearing HOA boards, demanding homeowners oh, and the legislative lunacy brought on by local politicians wanting to fix everything for us. It's a common sense perspective on the news and stories that affect you the most right where you live. Join Gene Sullivan every Saturday morning at 10:00 a.m. on AM 1280.
[00:16:00] Speaker E: The patriot colorectal cancer doesn't stop for.
[00:16:04] Speaker B: Covid-19 hello, I'm doctor Cecilia Brewington. If you are age 45 or older, it's time to return to care and get tested. The government requires insurance companies to cover.
[00:16:15] Speaker C: Not only colonoscopy, but a range of.
[00:16:18] Speaker B: Tests, including virtual colonoscopy and other less invasive exams. Talk to your doctor about your options today. For more information on virtual colonoscopy, visit radiologyinfo.org.
[00:16:31] Speaker C: I went to the eye doctor the other day with my daughter Maggie. I was shocked when the doctor told me that my daughter was already becoming nearsighted. It turns out that this problem affects more than 40% of Americans. My eye doctor thinks this disease is getting worse. Perhaps it's getting worse because of kids prolonged time spent playing with smartphones, or maybe because kids now spend less time outside. My genetics probably aren't helping her a whole lot, being nearsighted myself. But the good news is that the doctor told me about a new FDA approved product called Mysight. This specific one day contact lens is already worn by thousands of children in the US. It is proven to slow down the progression of nearsightedness. And best of all, Maggie loves these contact lenses. The doctor taught her how to use them. Now it is so exciting to see her have even more success in the classroom and when she plays sports. I recommend you visit openyoureyesradio.com to find an eye doctor that specializes in this treatment program. Learn
[email protected] dot we're back with doctor Stephen Kwey.
[00:17:35] Speaker E: His podcast, drstevenkway.com. and doctor Kway knows a lot about a lot of things. He has many patents.
Thanks to him, he's developed many pharmaceuticals and he's helped with breast cancer. But today we're talking about COVID and we were, before the break, we were talking a little bit about pepcid and ways to treat Covid if you get sick with it. So tell me a little bit more about Pepsin. How does that possibly work?
[00:18:02] Speaker B: Well, it interferes with the entry pathway of the virus, and it's a tight race between the virus growing fast enough to hurt you and your immune system catching it. So even a slight reduction in the ability of it to get into the cell is sufficient to do that. And pepcid works by the pathway of entry through the ace two.
[00:18:25] Speaker E: So tell me, the COVID virus, did a pangolin and a bat get together and do the horizontal hula? Is that how it happened?
[00:18:36] Speaker B: Yeah, I mean, that was the comedian. Is it John Stewart?
I mean, he's got an honorary virology degree in my book, because that was quite an episode there.
I've looked at it very carefully. And now, to be serious, because while there's a million people that died in the US, or 20 million worldwide, so this is really a major tragedy. And to the extent that it was man made, a preventable tragedy. So there is, we know now, after looking at 100,000 different animals or 400 different species, there is no ancestor to SARS CoV two in nature that you can point to and say, hey, well, that was the virus, that it changed and then it jumped into humans. And that's one of the many reasons why. It's many pieces of evidence that support that. It was laboratory derived and laboratory created. It's a man made virus.
[00:19:31] Speaker E: I mean, it's a man made virus. There were many patents. I want to go over some of the patents in a little bit, but I want to talk about a chimera virus, which is where they made. And they put all different types of viruses together, HIV being one of them. How many different viruses did they put together to make this virus?
[00:19:50] Speaker B: Yeah, chimera is a great word. It's greek. And I don't know what the two animals were, but basically, if you look at mythology, there are these strange creatures that are the head of a lion and the body of something else, a bear or something like that. So that's what the chimera means. And SARS cov two has. Well, it has a backbone of a bat virus. So it's a 30,000 letter word. This sarsco b two is a 30,000 letter word, which would be a 14 page pamphlet, if it was, it was written out, which takes over your genetic system in your body, which is the equivalent of 100,000 King James Bibles. So our genetic code is 100,000 Kim James Bibles and this little 21 page pamphlet takes it over. So that's kind of a pretty remarkable thing. But it is primarily a bat virus in the backbone, but then it's had things in the laboratory, man made things in the laboratory, laid on top of it. And probably one of the more interesting ones is the. The HIV recognition signals inside it. So they do very particular things in the cells, they cause very particular clinical situations, you would predict, and then you see them in the hospitals and things.
But I don't want you folks to think that it's like a rug made of remnants or something like that, with different segments. It's primarily two big segments and then a couple little pieces of HIV.
[00:21:21] Speaker E: So since there's HIV involved, what does it do to our immune system?
[00:21:26] Speaker B: So HIV started. Well, it actually was first recognized in Los Angeles the year I started teaching at Stanford Medical School, July there. So it dates me pretty heavily back to about 1980. But it has the capability of binding to a particular cell on a particular immune cell called a cd four cell, the thing it binds to, not the ace two, like SARS does, but it's called the gp 120 receptor out there. And so it was one of the first infections of this particular immune cell, which we need for all sorts of other immunities.
If you remember your history, HIV, while a virus, much like SARS CoV two, often presented with the strange yeast infections or strange parasites, things that would actually not even never infected humans before. People were showing up with infections of these very strange organisms. And that was because the HIV was first completely destroying the cd four cells, tamping down the immunity, and then you would get a secondary infection. So that was how we discovered it. And so we know now that things that bind to cd 120 infect those cells are going to have that effect. So January 26 of 2020, so it had barely gotten to the US.
There was a paper on a Friday night out of India that said, hey, if you look at the spike protein, there's these three pieces of about six to eight letters spread out over 150 letters. So they're not continuous. They're here, here and here. They're identical to what's in HIV. And then if you fold the protein up like it should be in nature, they all come together. So it's a twofold argument that they're the same linear sequences from HIV, and they fold together to make this gp 120 signal. This paper comes out on Friday. A journalist calls the NIH and says, what do you think of this paper? What's going on here? By Sunday afternoon, Doctor Fauci, Doctor Collins, you name it, are on the phone talking about what the heck this means, can we tamp it down?
And these young scientists, they're young, they're in their career, they're not famous people at all. They got browbeaten and they withdrew the paper. But it was. They didn't withdraw because the findings are wrong. I don't have I haven't talked to them. I don't know why they withdrew it, except it was probably pressure. But from Friday to Sunday, it went from a paper in a journal in India to the top of the us government's science research, saying, we got to get rid of this.
[00:24:07] Speaker E: So can you tell us about the role of Ralph Barrack at the University of North Carolina and his being funded by Fauci to develop this virus? Can you bring us through the history of that?
[00:24:21] Speaker B: Yeah. Well, let's go back to his early history, which was he was at University of Southern California, USC, working for a taiwanese doctor named Michael Lei or Lai. I'm not great with my chinese, even though my wife is taiwanese, but it's. Lai is his last name, the grandfather of coronaviruses. So that was Ralph's foundation in natural coronaviruses, how the genes are arranged. And from there, SaRS one happened. Michael was called back to Taiwan to handle the epidemic of SARS one there. And so Ralph goes back to his home state of North Carolina. But because he's 2030 years younger than Michael and trained in a different era, he began to go inside the genomes that are appearing naturally and to do things in the laboratory that nature has never done and might never do. So he is the father of synthetic biology of coronaviruses, has a number of patents, a number of foundational inventions in the whole space. And so from 30 years, he's been doing that. Now, excuse me, about 15% of the common colds we get. Remember, you and your kids, you get two or three colds a year. About 15% are coronaviruses, and they always have. And the other 85 are what's called a rhinovirus for the nose. So we've always had coronaviruses around us, but they're not usually pathogens, they're not usually that dangerous, if you could call it that. And so the research hasn't been. It's not like Ebola or things like that, where a lot of people die from it. So no one was kind of noticing all the work that was being done. But because he is a very skilled scientist, he's a very, you know, creative scientists, a very brilliant scientist. Because of his ability to develop tools inside the coronavirus, it became one of the most successful tools in the laboratory to make man made viruses. It's also very large. It's a 30,000 letter virus. HIV is about half that size.
It allows you to do a lot of things in there in terms of making it more effective or make you infect different cells or make it go to the brain. You can play with a lot of parameters, a lot of bells and whistles on something with 30,000 letters.
And so he's been doing this very successfully in terms of publications and grants and tens of millions of dollars in research monies ever since. And he has both. I mean, it is interesting, he has both money from NIH, which is what I had, and you have because you're in the medical field, but a lot of money from the Department of Defense, which is often considered to be doing defensive bioweapons related work. But there's reason defense and offense is, it's not like football. In football, you know, who has the ball. But in this kind of research, you can't be clear who's offense and whose defense.
[00:27:16] Speaker E: But if you take something out of nature and you put it in a lab and it becomes a biological agent and you use it on people, then that becomes a weapon that could be used and that could, and that's a crime that's being used against people. So what was his thought process in doing this? Was it money? Was it to hurt people?
[00:27:42] Speaker B: I'm going to be very careful, Kerry, because you're asking me to speculate on his inner thoughts. I'm not going to do that, but I'll go down the path to say that his public writings and statements are to try to develop what would be called a pan coronavirus vaccine. Pan meaning, you know, all covering or not quite sure the exact, you know, linguistics. But that has been his, he says is his foundation motivation. And it's also said in the context that other countries could be developing these. And therefore we need to have, you know, defensive weapons or they could come from nature, which is an interesting thing. I would love to have a debate about someone talking about a virus coming from nature to kill people the way this one did, because I don't think it's possible and I think I can actually predict why it's not possible. SARS one infected 10,000 people and killed 1500 mers. The next coronavirus infected 10,000 people, killed about 3000. This infected 2 billion. And that's differential between 10,002 billion is probably the differential energy power put into it by a man made virus.
[00:28:50] Speaker E: And it seems very odd to me that the virus was leaked out or was released on purpose, we don't know. But it went to all these places all over the world at the same time.
How did that happen? Even places where planes don't fly. So withhold that thought. I want you to think about that. We're going to be back. I'm speaking with doctor Stephen Kway and we're getting into some of the weeds about the coronavirus and his book the Origin of the Virus. His weapons website stephenquai.com. i'll be right back. This is doctor Kerry Gel.
[00:29:31] Speaker C: I went to the eye doctor the other day with my daughter Maggie. I was shocked when the doctor told me that my daughter was already becoming nearsighted. It turns out that this problem affects more than 40% of Americans. My eye doctor thinks this disease is getting worse. Perhaps its getting worse because of kids prolonged time spent playing with smartphones or maybe because kids now spend less time outside my genetics probably arent helping her a whole lot being nearsighted myself. But the good news is that the doctor told me about a new FDA approved product called Mysite. This specific one day contact lens is already worn by thousands of children in the US. It is proven to slow down the progression of nearsightedness. And best of all, Maggie loves these contact lenses. The doctor taught her how to use them. Now it is so exciting to see her have even more success in the classroom and when she plays sports. I recommend you visit openyoureyesradio.com to find an eye doctor that specializes in this treatment program. Learn
[email protected] Dot master Pool and Spa.
[00:30:33] Speaker A: Master Pool and Spa's blowout sale save up to 33% to 65% come in and we'll prove to you we have the best, best products at the lowest possible price. Master pool and Spa is Minnesota's largest spa dealer. We have the largest selection at unbeatable prices. Drive a little and save a lot. Some of our clients have driven hundreds of miles because the deals are that good. Master pool and spas blowout sale this is your chance to save big save up to 33% to 65% free delivery and trading's welcome welcome 18 month interest refinancing this is a limited time offer. Master pool and spa visit us today at 394 in Louisiana in St. Louis park. Look for the big blue sign. Check us out
[email protected] dot masterpoolandspa.com or call us at 952-253-0665 that's 952-253-0665 I.
[00:31:31] Speaker C: Went to the eye doctor the other day with my daughter Maggie. I was shocked when the doctor told me that my daughter was already becoming nurse sighted. It turns out that this problem affects more than 40% of Americans. My eye doctor thinks this disease is getting worse. Perhaps it's getting worse because of kids prolonged time spent playing with smartphones. Or maybe because kids now spend less time outside. My genetics probably aren't helping her a whole lot, being nearsighted myself. But the good news is that the doctor told me about a new FDA approved product called misite. This specific one day contact lens is already worn by thousands of children in the US. It has proven to slow down the progression of nearsightedness. And best of all, Maggie loves these contact lenses. The doctor taught her how to use them. Now it is so exciting to see her have even more success in the classroom and when she plays sports. I recommend you visit openyoureyesradio.com to find an eye doctor that specializes in this treatment program. Learn
[email protected] dot.
[00:32:33] Speaker E: This is Doctor Kerry Gelb. We're back with Doctor Stephen Kway. His book, the Origin of the Virus. Drc.com. so I asked a very important question before the, before the break. Doctor Kway, can you answer that and reframe the question to make it even a better question?
[00:32:50] Speaker B: Well, so, yeah, so the question was, how did this thing go from, it literally was one person being infected accidentally in the laboratory to going everywhere in the world, 2 billion people, the antarctic research stations, etcetera?
And the answer was actually. So the first public contribution I made, I called it the COVID conduit. Because what is the data?
People should understand how a scientist talk, because I think I will talk as a scientist. And when a scientist who isn't going to talk like a scientist talks, I'm going to talk about the evidence that I have and then the conclusions I make. And what that allows you to do is you could say, hui, I understand your evidence, but I don't. I come to a different conclusion. That's, that's a proper action for scientists. So what I did was I took every patient from December 1 to mid January of 2020, and I said, what hospital did they go to in Wuhan? Because, you know, most people go to the hospital nearest their home. And then I map that on a gridden. There are nine subway systems in Wuhan, and all of the patients run one line called line two, and the line two Covid conduit that includes the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the international airport. And it carried a million people a day, in the morning and night, in and out of the suburbs of Wuhan every day before the outbreak. The airport there had direct connections to about 18 different cities in Asia and Europe and the US. And because they engineered asymptomatic transmission. And that's kind of a very interesting why they did that and how they did it. You would, you could go 24 to 48 hours without having any symptoms, and you can go anywhere in the world in that period of time. And that is exactly what happened. So it spread. It spread out of there. If you look at the, at the non stop flights from Wuhan, those are the first cities. Milan in Italy and New York and Los Angeles and San Francisco in the US.
The one stop city, I mean, the first person in America was out of Seattle. He came from Wuhan through Japan and came into Seattle. So that was how it was transmitted that easily.
[00:34:59] Speaker E: And tell me about the 2002 patents at UNC Chapel Hill, where they weren't supposed to do collateral damage, but there was a defective clone of where they made a defective clone of the coronavirus.
Does that mean it was a weapon?
[00:35:20] Speaker B: No, no, not at all. What they were doing there was, that was, see, 2002, that's 22 years ago. So that was really the first time where Doctor Barek established that these are like building blocks or legos. You can take pieces in and out and take something from a really infectious virus or from a cat virus or from a cow virus and move it around. So that is historically very interesting because it was the first that did that.
You now can do that in a high school laboratory. That's the good and the bad of progress in molecular biology, is the first time you get a Nobel Prize, and then two years later you do it in high school. So that was the foundation of that particular work.
[00:36:07] Speaker E: Gary, and explain to me gain of function, why there was a gain of function memoratorium in 2014 at the uncle. And they actually received a letter from Niaid Fauci's where Fauci was head, stating that their grants haven't already been funded, but they received an exemption. So can you talk about that? And the 2016 journal article where SARS Cov, SARS coronavirus is poised for human emergence. If you could talk about that.
[00:36:45] Speaker B: Yeah. So we do have to go back to 2014, because I don't think a lot of people were paying attention at this point in time, but anyone in science was in the Netherlands and in Wisconsin almost simultaneously, scientists took a highly fatal 50% lethal influenza virus and said, but it's not very transmissible. You can't transmit very well. So ferrets, the ferret animals, they make mink out of them and think, you know, they're, they have nice fur.
The ferret is a good model of that. So what they did was they infected ferrets in one cage, they put a fan and they blew the air at ferrets in the other cage. And they saw how many times they would have to do what's called serial passage to get the virus to be airborne. Because if you have a 50% lethal virus, if we ever have a 50% lethal virus, Nipah is 70%, and they're working on that right now. Any 50% lethal virus that is airborne will end civilization. Carry. So it'll break energy transmission. You know, the guys that drive the trucks, food transmission, the people that deliver our food, police and fire. So we're on our own with respect to that and hospitals. I did a. It's called Monte Carlo. It's a fancy statistical test, but anything about 15% breaks civilization. And when it breaks, it's about a 200 year setback to get back to where it was when that happened.
[00:38:12] Speaker E: I want to talk about NEPA in a minute, but I want to ask you about the 2017 2018. The following phrase entered in common parlance in the community that there was going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. And then in 2019, the world was informed they were going to have an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen so that by September 2020, the world would have to accept the universal vaccine. And couldn't you talk about that?
[00:38:46] Speaker B: Yeah, and I apologize. I got really distracted. So anyway, these two folks did this experiment, and they made influenza airborne, and everyone went nuts. And President Obama said, hey, we are going to stop this research. Now, it was a voluntary moratorium, which meant you could kind of, you know, you didn't have to do it. And Ralph Barrett got permission because he did check. He was a careful, careful about that. At continued to do the work. And so then they prepared a bunch of documents and things so that when the next president came in, either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, as it turned out, they were prepared to drop, you know, about 18 inches of paper and say, hey, we studied this. We've got this under control. Please give us permission to do gain of function research again. And they did. And either president would have done that, because you're relying on your experts and you don't really know what's going on behind the scenes. So people who questioned this work were suppressed, even back then.
People were basically told, if you objected to this gain of function moratorium, it sounds almost like out of a movie, but it's bad for your grant funding is kind of the way you were told. And so people who were experts and could have been a voice of reason were silenced by that process. So there have been coincidences and things sort of predicting that this would happen in 2019 or 2018.
I am highly convinced with a lot of detailed data that this was accidental, that someone in the laboratory got infected accidentally because it's really easy to do with a very infectious virus and that it spread that way.
[00:40:23] Speaker E: I don't want to interrupt you for a second, but if it was accidental, why was there four patent applications by Moderna who were modified to include the term accidental and intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as justification to make a vaccine for disease that didn't exist in April of 2019?
[00:40:43] Speaker B: Yeah, I mean, I have 90 patents, so you got to be careful. I'm probably biased in that direction. But as I said, when Ralph Barrick was doing his 2002 work, the target was always a pan coronavirus vaccine, that no matter what coronavirus came from nature, we would have. We would have vaccines against it. So, you know, Moderna's been in the mRNA business trying to treat cancer, trying into vaccines. Never been successful before. SARS Cov two, which is quite interesting. All their trials were failures before that, but so I don't think it's nefarious that they were trying to do it.
It's kind of what I would have expected from them.
[00:41:24] Speaker E: Tell me about NEPA. Nipah. If that guy gets out, that could kill a lot of people.
[00:41:30] Speaker B: NEPA is a virus like a coronavirus, only it's 70% lethal, like that influenza, that's 50% lethal. It's not very well transmitted, and that's the only thing that keeps it from being pandemic. So over the course of the last four years, I, with colleagues in Australia and New Zealand, have developed what we call forensic tools to allow us to sort of remotely go into any laboratory in the world. If they put their raw data in a bank, you know, in a bank, which you have to do to public it, so that's a requirement. So anybody that puts their raw data in a bank, I can tell what they've been doing for the last two years in the laboratory inside that specimen. So when I looked at seven specimens from the wound Institute virology in December 2019, I was shocked to see that they have the Nipah virus there. But it's not just the Nipah virus from nature. They are taking it apart, they're putting it in clones, which is a way you amplify it. They're doing all of the things that you would do to make a man made version of the Nipah virus. And it's a bioterrorist agent. According to the CDC, it's only supposed to be worked on on the highest bla levels, BLC four, where you have the suits in the tube to the ceiling for your air. And yet here it was in the laboratory doing clinical specimens, which are the safety standards of a dentist office. So you're doing clinical specimens in that laboratory and you've got something that's 70% lethal.
[00:43:01] Speaker E: Why was it transferred from Canada to Wuhan?
[00:43:04] Speaker B: Oh, you tell me. You tell me. I mean, I wish I knew.
This is, again, is an interesting thing.
[00:43:11] Speaker E: So it scares the hell out of me that it was transferred to Wuhan.
[00:43:16] Speaker B: In July of what Kerry's talking about. July 2019, the Canadian Mounted Police show up at the only BLS, a four laboratory in Canada. Walking, arrest two chinese, escort them to the airport, send them back to China, because about a month and a half before, they had shipped 15 of the most lethal virus, 15 vials of the most lethal viruses on the planet on an Air Canada commercial flight to where? Brummerul Wuhan Institute of Virology, the NEPA that shows up in the laboratory in December of 2019. I can map the mutation, so I can map it right back to the virus from Canada. So he took a natural virus from Canada that they shouldn't have been transmitting, basically stole it, and then they were taking it apart, making a man made version of this virus. Seven months later on in the lab.
[00:44:08] Speaker E: We'Re talking with doctor Stephen Kway. He's fascinating. Drcway.com, comma, his website, he has his book that we have been talking about the origin of the virus. This is Doctor Kerry Gilbert. We'll be back in a moment.
[00:44:31] Speaker C: I went to the eye doctor the other day with my daughter Maggie. I was shocked when the doctor told me that my daughter was already becoming nearsighted. It turns out that this problem affects more than 40% of Americans. My eye doctor thinks this disease is getting worse. Perhaps it's getting worse because of kids prolonged time spent playing with smartphones, or maybe because kids now spend less time outside. My genetics probably aren't helping her a whole lot, being nearsighted myself. But the good news is that the doctor told me about a new FDA approved product called Mysite. This specific one day contact lens is already worn by thousands of children in the US. It has proven to slow down the progression of nearsightedness. And best of all, Maggie loves these contact lenses. The doctor taught her how to use them. Now it is so exciting to see her have even more success in the classroom and when she plays sports. I recommend you visit openyoureyesradio.com to find an eye doctor that specializes in this treatment program. Learn
[email protected] Dot life across America the.
[00:45:34] Speaker A: Billboard people did you know my mom's gonna have a baby? She is? Will it be a boy or will it be a girl? We don't know yet, but we heard the heartbeat and my dad said, this is gonna be someone very special. You mean like being a president or maybe a doctor? Well, probably. Maybe like a singer or dancer, I think.
[00:45:59] Speaker B: Hello, my name is Marianne Koharski.
[00:46:01] Speaker A: I'm the director of pro Life across America. We know that every baby is a miracle and has the potential to do great things. If you know someone who is pregnant or in need of alternatives or assistance or would like to support the work of pro life across America, please call 1803 667773 or visit our
[email protected] dot pro Life across America is non political and totally educational.
[00:46:25] Speaker C: Pro life across America I went to the eye doctor the other day with my daughter Maggie. I was shocked when the doctor told me that my daughter was already becoming nearsighted. It turns out that this problem affects more than 40% of Americans. My eye doctor thinks this disease is getting worse. Perhaps it's getting worse because of kids prolonged time spent playing with smartphones, or maybe because kids now spend less time outside. My genetics probably aren't helping her a whole lot, being nearsighted myself. But the good news is that the doctor told me about a new FDA approved product called misite. This specific one day contact lens is already worn by thousands of children in the US. It has proven to slow down the progression of nearsightedness. And best of all, Maggie loves these contact lenses. The doctor taught her how to use them. Now it is so exciting to see her have even more success in the classroom and when she plays sports. I recommend you visit openyoureyesradio.com to find an eye doctor that specializes in this treatment program. Learn
[email protected] dot I'm back with doctor.
[00:47:33] Speaker E: Stephen Kway from his book, the Origin of the Virus. His website, drcway.com. and we were talking about NePA being so deadly. So. And tell me about how we're going to prevent everybody from getting killed by. Bye, bioweapons.
[00:47:48] Speaker B: Yeah, I mean, look, it's very important to do an after action analysis of the, you know, the SARS, Cov two and the Covid-19 but we should, we should immediately transition to positioning ourselves so we don't, this doesn't happen again.
And I'm trying not to have a hill to die on. I mean, I would like to ban gain of function research. I've looked at it very carefully. It is, as far as I can tell, contributes, contributed nothing to the advancement of medical science. And I can say that.
[00:48:18] Speaker E: Why isn't it banned? I'm sorry to interrupt.
[00:48:21] Speaker B: I don't know. Well, it's not banned because that's, you know, Kerry, that's a more interesting question than you may have thought.
It doesn't seem to have any medical value that I can come up with. And you can, you can do the same things without doing it, but you still fold back into the kind, the idea that the DoD is supporting a lot of research here. All countries, all western countries are doing some form of this kind of research. So it may be non civilian use is the main reason, Kerry, I mean.
[00:48:49] Speaker E: In your book you talk about COVID ups. Why are they covering these things up?
[00:48:53] Speaker B: Well, the people who do the research have a simple conflict of interest. They get paid every two weeks. They take their paycheck to the bank and they get paid only to do gain, to function research. So if that's what your livelihood is, you can either do that or be, you know, pack groceries or something. So that's why they are interested. And then you go to the next people say in the government, and there is an interest in the power of this that I think strategically, national security wise, generates a lot of interest.
[00:49:26] Speaker E: I interrupted you before about how we're going to prevent this from happening again. What could the person sitting listening to this to help? What could they do that they need to contact their congressperson? What can we do to stop this gain of function research?
[00:49:38] Speaker B: Yeah. So I'll try to get a very simple version out there and then we can go down into it. So Senator Rand Paul will be introducing a new bill coming out in the next day or two. And the key thing is he and the other Republicans and maybe even some of the Democrats who are on the Homeland Security Committee need to hear from their constituents that I want you to honor the person I knew. I want you to honor my family member who died or the person down the street who died. I want you to remember their name. You know, tell them, tell them who they were to you, why it was so important, and honor them by passing this legislation because it does a lot of things. I've helped with some drafts on it over the last year does a lot of the things that will let me sleep at night, because if it's passed and it's followed, we will not be at risk of having, you know, a 15% or greater virus than within civilization.
[00:50:31] Speaker E: Peter Daszak, Ecohealth alliance. How is he involved in this?
[00:50:34] Speaker B: So, Peter Daszak is the president of a nonprofit organization based in New York City called Ecohealth alliance. And their agenda for 20 years is to scare people, to scare rich people, to give them money or to get grants from the government or get grants from the DoD. He had a lot of DoD money to go out and beat the bushes in strange places in Batcaves that nobody goes into to get the raw material, to get the natural viruses from nature. And we talk about gain of function, which is when you take a virus and you manipulate it to make it man made. I call this gain of opportunity. You take a virus that will never see a human being in its life, is stuck in a bat that has a five kilometer circle of flying, and you go into a cave and you collect some feces from a bat, you take it back to a lab in a city with 11 million people. You make it pure so it's not fighting with other viruses. The gain of opportunity that that generates for just a natural virus breaking out out is immense. And then you want to layer on natural evolution, man made features on top of that, and it just compounds it greatly.
[00:51:40] Speaker E: I want to turn to the vaccine. Edward Dowd, who, you know, since 2021, the vaccine rollout, there's been a 1.1 million excess deaths, 4 million disabled, 28.6 million people injured. In total, 33 million Americans have been injured or disabled from the vaccine. Why was this, why did they take, why did this vaccine come out? And why didn't it work? And why. Why did Pfizer hide a lot of the information and want to wait 55 or 70, 70 years before they would disclose the damage that this vaccine did.
[00:52:17] Speaker B: Yeah, a lot of questions there, Kerry. So I'll try to unpack it a little bit.
I will toot my own a little bit.
In my first book on physicians guide how to stay safe from coronavirus, chapter five, I predicted that there either would not be a vaccine or it would not be very effective. And that was based on scientific features of the coronavirus that make it very hard to make vaccines against as just a regular virus. And then this has some special features.
I don't like to fault people too aggressively in hindsight, because hindsight is 2020. So one aspect that I focus on is when you do a clinical trial with 40,000 people, which is what it was, 20,000 on each side of the arm, you won't find adverse events that happen, well, less frequently than one in 10,000. You just can't. Statistically, you can't do it. So an ordinary vaccine has a side effect. At one in a million, this thing has a side effect. So at one to 100,000, and then actually the cardiovascular thing is within the range. And there probably was some data on it in that first trial. So I think the more important thing is why you don't course correct with data that you get on the fly. So I can imagine saying, okay, let's start this trial. But I would have gone from maybe 40,000 patients in the clinical trials to say, let's do a controlled release of 200,000 for three months and let's see what happens in that population, and then do it gradually, as opposed to trying to go from data on 40,000 people, and then, oh, I'll just try it on 300 million. That's a disaster. And you just know that's a disaster.
[00:53:49] Speaker E: Well, you know, the pfizer, they experimented on 458 pregnant women, and they had a 10% miscarriage rate and a 50% side effect to the vaccine. And they didn't release that information, Gary, that.
[00:54:05] Speaker B: Okay, so let me give my version of that was when I looked at the clinical trial data out of the box. It also had animal studies in there, and I've invented seven drugs, so I kind of know how to look through these data packages to look for the problems that you're going to have in the future. And the first thing that jumped out at me is when they made the drug.
Well, they made radioactive so they could test it in animals. 12% of the dose went to the ovaries. I've never seen anything in 50 years of doing science that goes to the ovaries like that. I still don't know why exactly. I don't know what part of that darn vaccine goes to that. But I immediately said they should have done, you know, reproductive toxicology, which is the next thing you do when you see that signal, which I don't think they did. I wouldn't want to say for sure, but I never saw it. And then you watch people like that, like a hawk. But a month later, I was advising lots of people around the world, I don't know how pregnant, you know, trying to deal with the pregnancy. Should I get vaccinated or should I not? And I said, you know, I think you're better off not getting vaccinated, given what I've seen, what it's doing in the overdem. And then you're absolutely right, I think. And then, so there's the peak. There's a peak where you affect the pregnancies, of course, but then there's like 50% of women have menstrual changes. So they have period irregularities or heavy bleeding or. So the foundation of ovarian menstrual issues is pretty immense.
[00:55:31] Speaker E: And then I guess Lance is going to finally publish that study where they looked at autopsy reports, people dying after getting the vaccine, and almost 74% of them, they could say, was directly related to the injections, most of it being from the cardiovascular system. Something that Peter McCullough is one of the authors on. Can you just comment on that as we finish up? We got about a minute and a half left.
[00:55:57] Speaker B: Yeah, yeah. Okay. So one of the additional challenges that happened here was that the spike protein, which was the target for the vaccines, happens to be hugely toxic. It is toxic in and of itself. It's toxic with the blood that with the lining of the blood vessels. So if you do something to make your blood vessels even the slightest bit rough, the first thing the body does is it tries to make a clot there because it thinks you're bleeding to death. You've been bitten by a tiger and you know you're going to bleed out. So it makes a clot there. And so when you give someone the message to make flood the body with this protein, you're basically telling. You're basically making clots in every vessel you have.
[00:56:36] Speaker E: I'm sorry to interrupt you. We got about a minute left. Tell us what people who got the vaccine and they want to do something to try to get it out of their body. What can they do, Perry?
[00:56:46] Speaker B: All you can do is live well. I've seen some protocols. I have not seen the science behind them being terribly powerful. Live well, eat a lot of water, get your exercise 6000 steps a day, some gives you 15 minutes. You get as much vitamin D as you need in a little pill.
Sunscreen is a little overused. We're kind of going crazy there. So just healthy living is really the best thing you can do.
[00:57:11] Speaker E: Bromelain, nattokinase, curcumin or.
[00:57:14] Speaker B: Yeah, those are excellent.
The antioxidants, you got to balance your oxidation state because we make a lot of free radicals. It's a leaky mitochondria that generates free radicals. And a lot of the damage that we know in aging is free radical. Related.
[00:57:28] Speaker E: So, yeah, I want to thank doctor Steven Kway for joining me today. This has been a great interview. He's a great man. How could people find out more about you?
[00:57:36] Speaker B: Well, I have a website, www.drquay.com drqia.com, and I'm really going to try to spend the last ten years, 20 years, whatever I have, helping people broadly in the area of medicine, because we over rely on pills. There's so much you can do in just sort of natural approaches and also listening to your gut. If your gut's telling you something and the expert on the tv is saying something different, believe your gut.
[00:58:05] Speaker E: Thank you, Doctor Kway. Thank you for joining me today. Until next week, this is Doctor Kerry Gel for open your eyes radio.
[00:58:21] Speaker D: Well, summer is upon us and the weather is beautiful. Everyone has a favorite outdoor activity, golf, bike riding, bird watching, long walks. Ask 100 people and you'll get 100 answers. But if everyday aches and pains are keeping you on the sidelines, I have one answer. Relief factor. Relief factor is a 100% drug free daily supplement that helps your body fight pain naturally. Developed by doctors, relief factor uses a unique formula of natural ingredients. It doesn't just mask pain, helps reduce or even eliminate it. Wherever you're hurting back, neck, joints or muscles, in three weeks or less, you'll start to feel the difference all day, every day. So whatever you like to do, swimming, pickleball, hanging out in the garden, relief factor can help you feel good again and let you enjoy all your favorite outdoor activities all summer long. Relief factor.com 1804 relief 1804 735433 fight pain naturally with relief.
[00:59:21] Speaker C: You know, AAA can pull you out of a ditch and jump your battery, but we can also help you save on home and auto insurance, take the hassle out of planning your next vacation, and get you exclusive discounts on entertainment, shopping, restaurants and more. What are you waiting for? Join
[email protected] radio for just dollar 54 plus. For a limited time, get a second household membership for free.
